Back to Home Page
Anthony Nassar, Founder & Principal, Venture Momentum, Inc.
 
  In This Issue
Featured Interview – A True Entrepreneurial Story: From Inception to Liquidity
Featured Article– Choosing a Method of Accounting: Cash vs. a Cruel
Sneak Preview of Next Month’s Issue
About Venture Momentum
Expert Guidance for Bootstrapped Start-ups
  
March 10, 2004

Vol.1, Issue 2

Published on the second Wednesday of every month

Sign me up for this e-zine

  Featured Interview – A True Entrepreneurial Story: From Inception to Liquidity
 

Didier Moretti

After last month's interview on M&As with Jeff Karan, Managing Partner of Woodside Capital Partners, I thought you might be interested in a sequel to the theme with a true entrepreneurial story. So today, Didier Moretti, founder and former CEO of Annuncio Software, will share why he started Annuncio in late 1997; how he built it, grew it, and weathered the storm when the bubble burst in 2000; and how he successfully completed his company's acquisition by PeopleSoft in 2002.

Anthony: How did the idea of starting Annuncio come about, and what was behind the name of the company?

Didier: It was 1997 and marketing on the Internet was still in its infancy. It had become apparent to me that the Internet would change marketing in very significant ways. It offered a technology and a vehicle to quickly identify customers’ needs and personalize communications on products and services. Enterprises would be able to use such a technology to achieve dramatically better and faster results than traditional marketing methods at a mere fraction of the cost.

With this in mind, I started Annuncio Software to provide medium to large enterprises with a solution that enabled them to do three things: 1) get better results for less marketing dollars, 2) develop more profitable customers, and 3) drive revenue and the bottom line.

As for the name, all the American-sounding names we came up with were unavailable as domain names or trademarks. We chose to use an Italian word, annuncio, which means announcement, and it seemed to resonate well with what we were about. Annuncio was meant to be a temporary name, but our clients and employees embraced it, so we kept it!

Anthony: How did you finance your operation?

Didier: We raised venture capital funds from the very start. My co-founder and I raised $3.25M in Series A from Norwest Venture Partners and Advanced Technology Ventures before we hired anyone. We raised several small rounds until early 2000, when we decided to file for an IPO. We filed our S-1 registration statement, and were getting ready for our road show when the market for young technology companies crashed. We withdrew our S-1, went back into the private equity market, and closed an oversubscribed round of $38M.

Anthony: What sort of validation did you perform prior to developing your product?

Didier: We went through a thorough product and market validation process before we began product development. This was essentially a sales campaign to sell and validate our concept. We met with 30 prospects over a period of 4 months – the meetings entailed a short presentation, a mock-up product demo, and most importantly a structured discussion to probe the customer’s needs, wants, and willingness to buy.

We conducted these meetings in waves and refined our plans after each wave based on what we had learned. We called this the hunt for bad news, and it took 30 accounts until we stopped hearing things we had not thought about. As a result of this process, we identified our target markets and customers, positioning and value proposition, go-to-market strategy, and the key product requirements for our 1.0 release. We then designed and built the product.

This enabled us to hit the bull’s eye when we launched the company. The product and value proposition hit the mark, and our sales took off from the get-go. It also enabled us to anchor the management team – none of us had worked with each other before, and through the validation process we rallied around a common purpose, vision, and strategy for Annuncio.

This validation process was key to our success because the market was moving fast, and there were a few competitors who had started a year or so before we did. We had to hit the mark with our 1.0 release in order to succeed.

I think that such a process is even more critical today, given the scarcity of capital and milestone-based financings. My advice to entrepreneurs is: sell your product first, then design and build it!

Anthony: Tell us about your first customer, who helped put Annuncio on the map.

Didier: At the time, Netscape’s portal (NetCenter) dominated the Internet landscape and was on an exponential growth curve. If you could pick one ideal customer to gain immediate credibility as a leader in Internet marketing, they were it.

Netscape had started newsletters and marketing campaigns on the Internet, using internally developed tools. They were having serious scalability issues due to the explosive growth in their membership base, and were also restricted in their ability to personalize content. They re-examined their make vs. buy options and evaluated the few start-ups who were playing in this space. We had designed our product with a highly scalable architecture, and were able to win them as a customer in late 1998, when the product was still under development.

This was a bet the bank move for Annuncio, as Netscape’s volume requirements were orders of magnitude higher than any other prospect. Fortunately the bet paid off - we hired two senior consultants to work with the account through development and testing, and went into production successfully when we released our product.

Anthony: How long was your product development cycle?

Didier: It lasted 18 months, which is fairly typical for enterprise software applications. We started development in early 1998, and released the first version of our product in July 1999.

Anthony: Was Annuncio’s growth rate comparable to that of other competing CRM companies?

Didier: We were one of the fastest growing CRM (Customer Relationship Management) companies at the time. We generated over $1.5M in revenue in the first 6 months after we released the product, and over $10M the following year. In terms of head count we were very frugal by the standards of the time, until early 2000 when we stepped up hiring very significantly in anticipation of an IPO.

Anthony: What brought about the PeopleSoft Acquisition?

Didier: From the day we started Annuncio, we identified M&A as an important part of our growth strategy. In early 2000, as we were getting ready to file our S-1, we acquired a company, Brightinfo, to expand our product offering. Our intent was to go public, raise significant capital, and build a significant business with a focus on marketing.

As 2001 unfolded and market conditions changed, it became clear to us that the largest enterprise software vendors were going to end up dominating the CRM space. PeopleSoft was looking to make an acquisition in marketing automation to round up their CRM solution. They met with all the leading companies in the space and decided to pursue Annuncio on the basis of our technology, customer base, and the strength of our team.

PeopleSoft was appealing to us as a company that had been successful with acquisitions, and we thought our customers would react well to the transaction. We signed an agreement in early 2002.

Anthony: What are you doing currently?

Didier: I'm working as an adviser to several start-ups. Areas of interest at the moment include analytics, security and compliance, infrastructure, and communications.

Didier Moretti’s Bio:

Didier is currently a start-up adviser and investor. Previously he was Founder, Chairman, and CEO of Annuncio Software, a marketing automation company acquired by PeopleSoft. Prior to Annuncio, he was CEO of Cambio Networks, a network management company, and Vice President and General Manager at UB Networks, a networking company. Didier joined UB Networks when it was privately held; the company later went public and was acquired by Tandem Computers.

Didier earned an M.S. degree in computer science and electrical engineering, and an M.S. degree in business and technology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is also a graduate of Ecole Polytechnique, France.

 
  Featured Article– Choosing a Method of Accounting: Cash vs. a Cruel

As you launch your new venture, you must make many important decisions that will affect the way you manage your business and communicate with the outside world. One such decision occurs early on in the life of your venture - when you merrily install a brand new copy of your favorite accounting software.

The set-up wizard asks you to choose between two methods of accounting: cash or accrual. Your momentum is temporarily halted. This is often a hard and complicated decision for first time, early stage venture entrepreneurs because of its many tentacles, including GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) compliance, tax compliance, the level of in-house/outsourced accounting expertise needed, and, of course, cost.

First, I would like to briefly define each method. I will then use an example to illustrate some of the differences between the two methods before revealing which method may be more appropriate for an early stage venture.

Definition

In the cash method of accounting, revenues are recognized when cash is received, and expenses are recognized when cash is paid. This is a very simple and straightforward method, which does not require your bookkeeper to master advanced accounting knowledge and techniques, making it more affordable.

In the accrual method of accounting, revenues are recognized when goods are sold or services are performed. Expenses are recognized either after they are matched with their corresponding revenues, or after they have been incurred during the accounting period. With this method, both revenues and expenses are recorded regardless of whether cash has been received or paid.

The accrual method provides better matching of expenses and revenues than the cash method, resulting in a more accurate financial condition representation. It is, however, more complicated, error prone, and costly. I sometimes call it the cruel method of accounting for these same reasons.

Example

Let us say you are the only founder and employee of a software start-up you launched on 12/1/2003 and funded with an initial cash investment of $5,000. Immediately following the launch, you enter into a $40,000 software development agreement with a strategic partner and require 50% down upon contract execution, and no provisions for warranty work or refunds. You spend half of your time working on this project, and progress is expected to occur uniformly over a 5 month period to completion.

Your fully loaded compensation (salary, payroll taxes and benefits) since inception amounts to $10,000/month. However, you had not set-up payroll as of 12/31/2003, and therefore received no compensation in December. You had no cash outlays for expenses or equipment acquisitions during the month of December either. Your company’s fiscal year is calendar. No income taxes are paid in 2003. For the sake of simplicity, we will ignore in this example any accrued tax benefits or liabilities at the end of the year.

As shown in the table below, the cash method results in a whopping $20,000 profit realized without incurring any costs. In one month, you have grown your equity by 400%. On the surface, you have created a money machine and an ideal opportunity for investors. Unfortunately, the cash method does not provide a true reflection of your financial condition. Its main flaw is that it is based on recording cash receipts and disbursements, rather than the impact of a business event such as, in this case, the actual performance of services, or your unpaid compensation.

Looking at the financial results from the accrual method, your revenues for the period ended 12/31/2003 are only $8,000, based on a 20% completion. The cost of revenues for the period is $5,000, or 50% of your unpaid compensation for the time you spent on the project, which also corresponds to 20% of the estimated total cost of the project. The other 50% of your unpaid compensation is recorded as operating expenses and as an accrued compensation liability. The accrual method requires you to record a deferred revenue liability of $12,000, which is the difference between the $20,000 you received upon signing the contract and the $8,000 worth of services you performed by the end of the year. All in all, you have a liability of $22,000 as of 12/31/2003 corresponding to $12,000 in deferred revenues and $10,000 in unpaid compensation. You also realized a loss of $2,000, as compared to the more appealing profit alternative of $20,000 for the cash method.

Financial Results for the period ended Dec 31, 2003

This simple example illustrates what’s in store for you with the accrual method, a standard technique for the seasoned accountant, and a source of headaches for the less experienced bookkeeper.

So which button should you select to complete your accounting software installation: Cash or Accrual?

Below I will give you 5 points in favor of the accrual method. The presumption here is that you have ambitious plans for your venture, including funding by VCs/Angels and eventually a liquidity event by means of an acquisition or an IPO.

5 points in favor of the accrual method for your early stage venture

  1. The accrual method provides better matching of expenses and revenues than the cash method, resulting in a more accurate representation of your financial condition for a given reporting period. Consequently, you are better able to assess your financial performance and manage your business accordingly.
     
  2. The accrual method is required under GAAP; if you decide to prepare your financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which you should, the cash method is not an option. Please note that the accrual method is a necessary but not sufficient condition to be GAAP compliant.
     
  3. Choosing the accrual method and preparing your financial statements according to GAAP gives you access to a number of industry guidelines and benchmarks, especially from readily available financial data of publicly traded companies, to help you assess the operating performance of your venture.
     
  4. Investors expect your financial statements to be prepared according to GAAP.
     
  5. You may be required to use the accrual method in accordance with certain IRS rules current as of the date of this issue (March 2004) and provided at http://www.irs.gov/publications/p538/ar02.html#d0e1567.

This may not be the guidance that first time, early stage venture entrepreneurs typically want to hear because it requires more complex and costly accounting. Keep in mind that throughout your start-up journey, you will be walking on many challenging paths to success, and the accrual method is just another one of those paths.

Please note that there are many small business situations for which the cash method makes sense. Also note that depending on your circumstances, the cash or accrual methods may result in a more or less advantageous tax situation for your venture. Please consult with a qualified tax and/or financial professional to analyze the specifics of your business prior to finalizing your selection of the accounting method.

 
  Sneak Preview of Next Month’s Issue

The size of your market can play a big role in making or breaking your venture. In next month’s issue, I will ask two experts their views on how you go about quantifying the size of your market. Stay tuned for this informative interview with Steve Bengston, Managing Director of Emerging Company Services (ECS) at PircewaterhouseCoopers, and Robert Labatt, CEO of Ezboard, Inc., and former Principal Analyst with the Gartner Group.

 
  About Venture Momentum

Venture Momentum, Inc. is a financial management firm that assists early stage venture entrepreneurs in building a strong financial organization and laying the foundation for successful fund raising. To learn more, give me a call at 1.415.897.0195 or visit http://www.venturemomentum.com

 
  Expert Guidance for Bootstrapped Start-ups

A strong financial base is at the foundation of every successful business. To support your start-up's growth, Venture Momentum Inc. is now offering a new service: One Day, One-on-One Training Sessions that will provide you with an arsenal of knowledge and tools for building a sound financial organization with your current resources and staff. Give us a day, and we’ll show you the way. Sign-up before March 31st to take advantage of the 40% launch discount. For more details, please call or visit http://www.venturemomentum.com/training.html


Disclaimer: The information in the e-zine (the "Information") is current as of the date of the issue shown at the top of the e-zine. The Information is intended solely to illustrate general concepts and guidelines on various business subjects. It may not apply to specific situations. The Information does not constitute accounting, financial, tax, legal or other professional advice. You are urged to consult with a qualified professional who can understand your specific situation and advise you accordingly. No Information creates a warranty. All Information and links to other websites are provided on an ‘as-is’ basis without any warranties, express or implied, including warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall Venture Momentum, Inc., its authors, publishers, contributors and editors be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages of any kind whatsoever arising out of your use of this e-zine, the Information, and/or links to other websites regardless of the cause of action.
 
Copyright ©2004 Venture Momentum, Inc. All rights reserved.

Back to Home Page