Back to Home Page
 
Anthony Nassar, Founder & Principal, Venture Momentum, Inc.
 
  In This Issue
Note from Anthony
Featured Interview – One Entrepreneur, Two Approaches to Funding
Article of the Month – Have You Got Free Cash Flow?
Sneak Preview of Next Month’s Issue
About Venture Momentum
  
November 10, 2004

Vol.1, Issue 9

Published on the second Wednesday of every month

Sign me up for this e-zine

  Note from Anthony

Dear Reader,

We had a very successful event at SDForum last month. Approximately 40 people learned my systematic approach to financial planning, and enjoyed a great VC panel discussion and legal presentation. According to the audience’s feedback, as reported by SDForum, over 85% of the attendees said they would recommend this event to a colleague. I’ll be presenting “Crafting the Financial Roadmap of Your Start-up” again on Wednesday November 17 at an event hosted by InterFrench Silicon Valley in Santa Clara, CA.

I’d like to extend a warm welcome to the many new subscribers to Propel Your Venture. If you’ve missed a past issue, you can find archives of prior interviews and articles on our website. Please feel free to pass this e-Zine on to friends and colleagues.

If you happen to be in the Bay Area tonight, I hope to see you at WorkIt's Silicon Valley Mixer and Five Year Anniversary Party.

To YOUR Venture’s success,

Anthony Nassar
Founder & Principal
Venture Momentum, Inc.
415-897-0195
http://www.venturemomentum.com
 

  Featured Interview – One Entrepreneur, Two Approaches to Funding
 

Nagesh Challa

Today I interview Nagesh Challa, co-founder & CEO of Ecrio Inc., and co-founder & former CEO of Nexcom Technology, Inc. I’ve known Nagesh for over 10 years and worked closely with him in senior financial and planning capacities at both companies. He has amazed me throughout the years with his accurate vision not only of the next technology, but also of its application in the marketplace. One example is flash (non-volatile) memories, which are being widely used nowadays as storage commodities in digital cameras, mobile phones, digital music players and as USB flash drives. I’m happy to share what he’s currently working on, his experiences as a serial entrepreneur, and his outlook on the wireless market.

Anthony: Nagesh, can you give us an overview of Ecrio?

Nagesh: Ecrio is a 5-year old software “start-up." We develop standards-based software for mobile phones that will be used on the advanced 3G (3rd generation) networks. By standards-based software, I mean software that is used to introduce wireless services and ensure interoperability based on open standards between different carriers and service providers. Examples of existing standards-based wireless services are SMS (short messaging service) and MMS (multimedia messaging service). These services need to be standards-based so that users aren’t limited to messaging people only in the realm of their network operator and are able to communicate with friends and business associates on other mobile networks as well.

We’re finally seeing the advanced 3G networks being deployed by operators worldwide: FOMA by DoCoMo in Japan, UMTS in the US on the ATT Wireless networks, and others. These networks are IP based. They support multimedia and bring broadband to mobile phone users. As a result, there is a great opportunity to equip mobile phones on these networks with advanced software that enables services such as Mobile TV, Multimedia messaging, Audio and Video streaming, and Push to Talk. This is a very large and growing market that Ecrio serves. Our products include Push To Talk, Instant Messaging, and client software that enables new services on the IP based Multimedia networks (IMS framework).

Ecrio’s target market is well defined: mobile phone manufacturers. There used to be just 5 or 6 mobile phone manufacturers worldwide. But now that number has grown drastically to include manufacturers in the US, Europe, Japan, Taiwan, China, and Korea. Our customers include such companies as NEC and Panasonic.

Japan, in particular, is a very important market for Ecrio as the large Japanese OEMs are looking to supply standards-based software on their phones to operators globally. Furthermore, Japanese operators are now looking to deploy standards-based interoperable services on the new 3G networks.

Anthony: What is Push to Talk?

Nagesh: Push to Talk over Cellular (PoC) is a Walkie Talkie-like experience on your mobile phone. Nextel has done a good job of popularizing this service, where you can push a button on your mobile phone and have a quick one-way voice messaging between you and someone in your address book. This service is becoming very popular. Nextel has achieved a high ARPU (Average Revenue per User) from this service. So other operators are looking at PoC too, as they continuously try to increase their ARPU.

The Nextel network is a proprietary one. They were able to achieve very good performance on their PoC service from a latency standpoint. This means if you press the button on your mobile phone, you can immediately establish a connection. To do that across other networks requires a standards-based approach, which was a challenge initially. However, the network technology has improved over the years, and we are now able to have PoC on regular GSM or CDMA networks as well. The proprietary network will always perform best because it's built for a specific purpose and can be fine-tuned. And while the standards-based networks may have some performance issues, you’re still able to enjoy a reasonably good user experience.

Anthony: How did you fund the company?

Nagesh: We had an early angel round of financing, which we used to develop our first product and generate revenues in our first year. We then had two subsequent larger rounds including angels and VCs. To date, we have raised about $12M.

Anthony: What is your outlook on the Wireless Market?

Nagesh: There are very strong trends in the wireless market that everyone is aware of. The number of mobile phone subscribers is increasing; so is mobile phone usage. The mobile phone networks are getting faster and more sophisticated. And the phones themselves are becoming more advanced, with a greater software component and more powerful processors. You are able to do more and more things with your mobile phone, including email, instant messaging, video, and Internet access. In some countries, people first experience the Internet through the mobile phone instead of a computer. So as the number of services and products in the mobile area increases, and as mobile phone manufacturers look to create more and more differentiation from their competition, it’s difficult for any one of them to keep up with all the required software. In the past, they had large R&D teams providing everything, including the phone itself and the software to operate it. Today they are moving more towards outsourcing or licensing some of these products from third parties, especially the standards-based solutions. And this presents a huge opportunity for software vendors like us to provide them with a wide range of software products.

As mobile devices are getting increasingly sophisticated with more software, instant messaging will become as popular on the mobile network, as it is on fixed networks. With presence services, you can see the people who are online and send them a text message, a picture or an audio clip. You have the ability to know if your friend is available. On the other hand, voice services such as voice calling or sending messages via SMS are generally hit or miss because you don’t know when someone will hear or read your message. So instant messaging provides that real-time experience, which is why it’s becoming so popular.

There will be different types of new messaging services available. Like Push to Talk, there could also be a “push to view” or “push to see” service, allowing you to view what I am viewing at the push of a button because of the camera on my phone. With more advanced wireless networks and phones, this kind of service will soon become possible. Overall, this market will be very large and grow rapidly.

There are approximately 1.3 billion mobile phone users today, with 150 million new phones shipping every quarter. And most of these users are in North America, Europe and parts of Asia. While we have not seen a deep penetration of mobile phone usage in China, India, Africa, and many other countries, this is starting to change. I think that China and India are great examples of the rapid rate at which this growth is occurring. There are great opportunities to create new services for these particular markets, as the volume will be huge. However, because of the economic differences between some of these countries and the so-called developed countries, operators will need to be innovative in coming up with a new business model and ways to charge for usage per message that would work well in these new markets.

Anthony: What can you tell us about your previous start-up, Nexcom Technology?

Nagesh: Prior to Ecrio, I co-founded a company called Nexcom Technology, which we started around 1989. It was a completely bootstrapped and self-funded operation. I had some ideas about how to do flash memory in a particular way, and how to apply flash memory, especially in the mobile and handheld spaces. Early on, I filed patents in this area. As a company we licensed the technology to a variety of semiconductor manufacturers and provided them with both the license and services to create new products. I was granted several patents both in the semiconductor and the mobile areas. We leveraged our strong intellectual property position at Nexcom and created some very unique storage products for handheld and mobile portable equipment with very high capacities, high densities and ultra low power. These were the characteristics we specialized in.

I think one of our major accomplishments was that we ran the company profitably for about 8 years with no venture funding. Our financial resources came exclusively from the revenues we generated from licensing our intellectual property. This approach certainly had some drawbacks and limitations.

I’d like to make an important observation, which relates to this type of bootstrapping technique. Make sure you clearly separate the intellectual property you're working on for your customers as a consultant from the technology you are developing for your own products.

We had our liquidity event late 1997 when we were acquired by ISSI, a publicly traded semiconductor company in the Silicon Valley. Returns for the founders and employees were dependent on when people sold their holdings as the stock price fluctuated between single digits and more than $40/share since the acquisition.

Anthony: Can you compare the two situations at Ecrio and Nexcom?

Nagesh: The Nexcom model was entirely self-funded and bootstrapped. We could not spend a dollar until we earned it. We had to watch all our dollars very closely and work for food initially by contracting our services to customers. We then used those profits to continuously develop our technology and build the company. At Ecrio, on the other hand, we raised money from the start through angel and institutional rounds and were funded to develop products.

In the self-funded case, you have the flexibility to make decisions and the freedom to act on your own. You have a quick consultation and then you move forward. At the same time, your flexibility and freedom are limited because you have very little money to spend. Conversely, when you raise money and have secured a sufficient amount to fund your business plan, it’s wonderful because you can then focus very sharply on accomplishing your objectives. With the right VCs backing you, you get a lot of support so things happen relatively quickly. It's great when things go well. The fundamental difference is when things don’t go according to plan. Then you're forced to decide on what to do next. Financially motivated investors - and that’s what they are by definition - would like you to take more drastic actions sooner. This can sometimes be good for the company and enable you to emerge as a stronger business. But for an entrepreneur, it can be very difficult because it can go against the entrepreneurial spirit. And that’s always the tough part.

Anthony: You saw a new market with solid-state storage many years ahead of its time. You also developed products for that market many years ahead. What conclusions would you draw from that experience?

Nagesh: It’s very important as an entrepreneur to pay close attention to the proper timing of the market. I don’t know if one can get it right or if there is a formula for getting it right all the time. But one has to be constantly looking at that and understand that customer activity doesn’t necessarily mean there is a real market, so you need to separate the two.

For example, in one case a few years ago, we had a tremendous amount of attention given to one of our products in the mobile space, where all the operators wanted to get a trial and get things going. At the end of the day, almost no one ended up buying the product until much later. The activity of doing a trial on the products, evaluating them, and submitting RFPs (requests for proposals) doesn’t necessarily indicate that the market is there. People are just studying the product and evaluating whether or not it is feasible to make money with it. One needs to recognize that for what it is and not mistake it for an actual market moving forward.

At Nexcom, for example, we created flash memory devices in 1 and 2 MB densities many, many years ago in a SIM card format (personal identity module that goes into GSM mobile phones) with the belief that the SIM cards would become more and more popular over time. We went out saying that these would be the ideal platform and format to deliver a very large amount of flash memory once it is configured like a disk drive or a floppy drive. While conceptually it was great, there really wasn’t much of a need (by mobile phone manufacturers, or anybody else), to have large amounts of memory residing on these cards. They didn’t know what to do with it.

Eight or nine years later, we are seeing large amounts of memory usage, whether it's for digital cameras or mobile phones. In that respect, especially when we were targeting the mobile phone manufacturers, it was quite early. It was a good idea fundamentally, but the timing was off. It's extremely important to recognize how important the right timing is for a product or service you create. And while it's not rocket science to figure that out, it can be very tricky to get it right. You need to be constantly watching and make sure that the market is indeed validated. And you know it is when customers start to buy in volume.

Anthony: You chose to globalize Ecrio and Nexcom early on. Is this part of your entrepreneurial style?

Nagesh: Businesses globalize when they recognize that their markets are not confined to the domestic geography, but include foreign countries as well. So they go looking for customers in the global markets, delivering products to them and supporting them. We’ve had one important advantage: we were either too naïve or not afraid enough of going out and looking for customers anywhere, so we found them all over the world: Europe, Japan and Taiwan. We’ve always been successful in doing that.

Globalization can be beneficial to a business when done properly. Many people will advise you to take care of your domestic market first before going overseas. So if your product has a broad appeal in multiple markets, it would probably be better to perfect it first in the domestic market and then take it globally. Globalizing our businesses has had the benefit of allowing us to diversify revenue sources and smooth revenues, as economies grow at a different pace in various parts of the world.

Anthony: What are your thoughts on outsourcing?

Nagesh: I believe there are two approaches: Outsourcing and Off-shoring. Any time you give work to someone outside your company, you are outsourcing. So if I hire an attorney from a law firm who specializes in corporate law, I am outsourcing. If I need a certain specialty that I don’t have in-house, I would hire someone outside to do it for me. This makes sense because, as a small company, it is not economically feasible to bring some of these functions in-house. The advantage is that you only get what you need at the time you need it. You are not saddled with the overhead associated with hiring a person full-time, but you pay a price for that convenience. Outsourcing has been around for a long time and is being used by a great number of businesses, including ours.

The other approach is that of off-shoring, where you go to labor markets which have economic benefits compared to where you are today. Basically, you go to areas where you can buy the same service for a much lower price than in your domestic market. This is becoming more and more common nowadays. Software, for instance, is being developed in India, China, Romania, Russia, and other parts of the world. We’ve used off-shoring as well, because we’ve been fortunate enough to have some of our earlier affiliates leave the domestic market and set up development centers overseas. So we’ve used them to develop our products cost effectively.

Off-shoring, however, has its own problems. You have to be very careful and, much like with outsourcing, you need to have a process to properly manage the relationships, monitor progress, and have a very clear understanding of what the deliverables are. It’s very much like managing any other project within the company. It needs to be done right.

Anthony: What advice would you give today’s entrepreneurs?

Nagesh: It is very important for entrepreneurs to not only make sure that the market is huge, but to also get the right investors to back them.

You need to have a very clear idea of your total addressable market and customers. It’s easy to lose sight of the market segment that's buying your product vs. the general market that may have a loose interest in what you’re doing. Make sure you separate these two and focus on the segment that’s buying, because the money will only come from that segment.

As an entrepreneur, you should have a very clear focus and understand the financial implications of every step. You need to develop a solid financial plan and understand key issues such as: how does the funding work? What does it mean in terms of dilution? What will subsequent funding rounds entail? How will the shares be distributed? What are the tax implications? etc… Put some thought up front into how you are going to exit and what you are going to exit for. When starting out, very few entrepreneurs spend enough time thinking about all these matters, which are extremely important. Make sure you seek professional advice to help you understand all the potential ramifications from the start.

Bio

Nagesh Challa is the CEO and co-founder of Ecrio, a privately held company that develops and markets presence-enabled software products for mobile phones and networks. Ecrio's technology connects fixed and mobile end points to provide seamless solutions for voice and data. Ecrio markets its products through OEM relationships with mobile and enterprise infrastructure companies.

Prior to Ecrio, Mr. Challa founded Nexcom Technology Inc., a Silicon Valley start-up that pioneered the concept of mass storage for mobile devices. He assembled and managed a team of 30 professionals and negotiated several license agreements with large global OEM's. He successfully sold Nexcom to ISSI (Nasdaq:ISSI) in December 1997. During his 20-year career, he held various engineering and management positions with National Semiconductor, Exel Microelectronics and Catalyst Semiconductor.

Mr. Challa received a BS in Physics from Andhra University, India, an MS in Physics from Western Michigan University, and was a graduate student at Purdue University before starting his career in the Silicon Valley. He has been granted 19 patents in semiconductors, software and mobile technologies.
 

  Article of the Month – Have You Got Free Cash Flow?

As an entrepreneur, you're constantly reminded that cash is king. A thorough understanding of your cash flow, current and projected, is not just a necessity. It’s a matter of survival. And while it's critically important that you know what your start-up’s cash balance is at all times, it's equally important that you fully grasp the process of computing where your cash is coming from (sources of funds) and where it’s going (uses of funds). Such a process enables you to 1) get a handle on what happened to your cash when analyzing historical financial data, and 2) derive your cash flow projections when developing your financial plan. Unfortunately, this exercise is not always trivial for those entrepreneurs who have limited knowledge of financial accounting.

While many accounting packages generate a Statement of Cash Flows at the push of a button, I thought it would be useful to walk you through that process to help clarify where the numbers come from. In this article I will rely on a slightly modified version of the data in the financial model I use in my seminars on financial planning. I will also briefly discuss the important notion of free cash flow towards the end of this article.

There are three essential rules one needs to keep in mind:

  1. Your starting point is the Net Income figure from your historical or projected income statement for the period you are interested in analyzing (month, quarter, six months, etc…)
     
  2. The ruling formula of this exercise is the one that governs balance sheets, i.e. Assets = Liabilities + Equity
     
  3. You need two balance sheet snapshots to perform the computation. The first snapshot should be one day prior to the start of the period being analyzed. The second snapshot is at the end of that period. For example, if your period is January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, you would use one balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 and one as of December 31, 2005.

    The financial model in this example was developed using the accrual method of accounting. The period contemplated in this exercise is January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005. Net Loss for that period is $6,390,000 and depreciation is $91,583. The company raises $12M in a Series B Preferred Stock transaction in 2005. Qualifying transaction costs associated with the financing round, such as legal expenses, are $150,000, leaving $11,850,000 in net cash proceeds from the financing transaction.

    The first step is to take the two balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005 and compute the differences between every line item as shown below.

    As you can see, the governing formula of the balance sheet (Assets = Liabilities + Equity) is preserved in the column labeled “Difference”.

    In order to arrive at the statement of cash flows, which details the sources and uses of funds, you simply take the figures from the “Difference” column, other than “Cash and cash equivalents” and “Retained earnings”. You will need to change the sign of those figures from the “Difference” column on the asset side of the equation, as an increase in an asset account will correspond to a decrease in cash flow, and a decrease in an asset account will correspond to an increase in cash flow. You then group the resulting sign-adjusted figures into 1 of the following 3 categories:
     

    1. Cash Flow from Operating Activities
    2. Cash Flow from Investing Activities
    3. Cash Flow from Financing Activities

    So how does one do the grouping?

    Based on the line items in this example, we have the following breakdown:
     

    1. Net Loss, Depreciation, and account differences for Accounts receivable, Prepaid expenses, Deposits, Other assets, Accounts payable and Accrued expenses fall under “Cash Flow from Operating Activities" because all these accounts pertain to the operations of the company.
       
    2. The difference figure from Property and equipment falls under “Cash Flow from Investing Activities" because it pertains to the activity of investing in fixed assets. However, the figure needs to be adjusted to reflect the increase or decrease in Property and equipment, excluding depreciation. In this case, the company purchased $181,000 worth of Property and equipment during the period. The period depreciation was $91,583 and the Net property and equipment figure in the “Difference” column is $89,417.
       
    3. Finally, the short-term bank loan reimbursement of $100,000, and the net proceeds from the Series B preferred stock financing of $11,850,000 fall under “Cash flow from Financing Activities."

    Having completed all the computations and classifications, we can now look at the resulting report titled “Statement of Cash Flows Projections”, and displayed below:

    What do we learn from this report?

    The company would have burnt nearly $6.4M in operating cash in 2005 (the details of the various components of the sources and uses of funds are shown in the statement of cash flows under the section titled “Cash flow from operating activities”). It would also have acquired $181K in additional Property and equipment during that same year, bringing the total cash burn to approximately $6.6M.

    To fund its growth, the company would have raised $11.85M in equity. It would also have eliminated $100K in short-term bank debt, bringing the net cash inflow from financing activities to $11.75M.

    The period ending in December 2005 would result in a net increase in cash of approximately $5.1M, which corresponds to the excess of the proceeds from financing activities over the cash used in operating and investing activities.

    So does this company have any free cash flow? And what is free cash flow anyway?

    Unfortunately, free cash flow is not cash flow that is distributed for free at a philanthropic event. It is simply the cash that is available for future growth and/or for distribution to shareholders, after the company has financed its operations and capital expenditures. In this case, it's a negative $6.6M (-$6,455,403-$181,000). In other words, the company is eating away, in 2005, a good chunk of the cash raised in the financing round. For example, if cash flow from operating activities was $800K instead of a negative $6.6M, then free cash flow would have been $619K (after subtracting $181K for the acquisition of fixed assets) - clearly a healthier financial picture.

    Positive free cash flow is typically non-existent in the life of early-stage start-ups, as they thrive to build their team, develop new products and take them to market. However, as the venture matures, it must aim to produce a substantial free cash flow in preparation of an anticipated exit strategy. Free cash flow is very important to investors because it provides a measure of a company’s ability to generate cash for distribution to shareholders as dividends, and/or pursue new business opportunities. You’ll even see it as one of the financial parameters in the Key Statistics page for publicly traded companies on Yahoo! Finance. So make sure you are cognizant of this metric. It’s important to your investors, and therefore to you as an entrepreneur while your venture develops.

    Finally, I’d like to caution you that this article does not cover many accounting complexities and other aspects encountered in cash flow statements and free cash flow computations. Examples are inventories, dividends, tax adjustments for stock options, deferred tax benefits, etc… Please consult with a qualified financial professional when putting together these types of computations and reports for your company.

  Sneak Preview of Next Month’s Issue

Next month, I will interview David Hardesty, Vice President of the accounting firm Wilson Markle Stuckey Hardesty & Bott, and publisher of the weekly online tax journal EcommerceTax.com. David, who has been honored by Accounting Today as one of the “Top 100 Most Influential People in Accounting” for 2004, will address important issues related to taxation, governance and stock options.

 
  About Venture Momentum

At Venture Momentum, Inc., we work with start-up entrepreneurs who wrestle with finance and accounting. We help you put together the pieces of your financial puzzle by providing a solid foundation from which to successfully raise capital, manage growth and achieve liquidity. To learn more, give me a call at 1.415.897.0195 or visit http://www.venturemomentum.com.


Disclaimer: The information in the e-zine (the "Information") is current as of the date of the issue shown at the top of the e-zine. The Information is intended solely to illustrate general concepts and guidelines on various business subjects. It may not apply to specific situations. The Information does not constitute accounting, financial, tax, legal or other professional advice. You are urged to consult with a qualified professional who can understand your specific situation and advise you accordingly. No Information creates a warranty. All Information and links to other websites are provided on an ‘as-is’ basis without any warranties, express or implied, including warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall Venture Momentum, Inc., its authors, publishers, contributors and editors be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages of any kind whatsoever arising out of your use of this e-zine, the Information, and/or links to other websites regardless of the cause of action.
 
Copyright ©2004 Venture Momentum, Inc. All rights reserved.

All marks are the property of their respective owners.

Back to Home Page